Training Courses Topic Date Price
Implementing Metrology and SPC concepts with MS Excel

September 23, 2019   8:00 AM - 5:00 PM

\$395 Per Person
Force Fundamentals

September 24, 2019 - September 25, 2019   8:00 AM - 5:00 PM

\$750 Per Person
Advanced Measurement Uncertainty and New ISO 17025 Discussion

September 26, 2019 - September 27, 2019   8:00 AM - 5:00 PM

\$750 Per Person
Special Offer for 5 Days of Training in September, 2019

September 23, 2019 - September 27, 2019   8:00 AM - 5:00 PM

\$1395 Per Person

*Special Offer: Register for 3 training events (Implementing Metrology and SPC Concepts, Force Fundamentals, and Advanced Measurement Uncertainty and New ISO 17025 Discussion) in 5 days for only \$ 1395.00.*

Classes Abstracts

NCSLI Regional Presentation April 13, 2016

A2LA Force Presentation March 11, 2016

NASA Tech Briefs Webinar, Oct 28, 2015

Webinar videos

NASA Webinar: Measurement Traceability and Errors Related to Force Measurement

4 Steps to Choosing the Right Calibration System

Calculating Force Uncertainties Using ASTM E74

Performing Risk Analysis with Method 5 or Method 6

ASTM E74 Explained

The Importance of Adapters for Best Force Calibration Results

ISO 376 Explained

Force Measurement Uncertainty

Measurement Risk and the New ISO 17025 Standard

Best Practices For Force Measurement

What is Measurement Traceability

Low-Capacity, Low-Cost, High-Value Force Calibrating Machines

Why a 4:1 TUR is not enough: The importance of analyzing the probability of false accept risk

Webinar Topic Date Price
Why a 4:1 TUR is not enough: The importance of analyzing the probability of false accept risk
40 min

May 16th, 2019 11:00 AM - 11:40 AM Eastern Time Zone

Why a 4:1 TUR is not enough:
The importance of analyzing the probability of false accept risk

Several organizations and publications reference or insist on maintaining a 4:1 Test Uncertainty Ratio (TUR) without understanding the level of risk that they may be subjecting themselves to. The general thought is if the lab performing the calibrations has standards at least four times better then what they are calibrating that everything is good. This webinar discusses TUR, PFA Risk, and why the location of the measurement matters. We will discuss two managed risk guard banding methods (5 & 6) found in the ANSI/NCSL Z540.3 Handbook. We will show that a 4:1 TUR is not enough and can result in a 50 % risk. This webinar is intended for anyone thinking a 4:1 TUR or TAR is enough as we will prove that thought process to be somewhat flawed. Others wanting to know more about risk should also attend.

Learning Objectives:

*The webinar attendee will understand that a 4:1 TUR & 4:1 TAR is not enough when analyzing risk

*The webinar attendee will learn more about the role measurement uncertainty makes in making statements of conformance

*The webinar attendee will know the importance of the location of the measurement and leave with a basic understanding of guard banding

Free